Seriously? An extemely desirable woman is the loser because she has “lower” herself to have the same as average women? That’s your loser? Not the whole majority of men that are left alone by the workings of this model?

The section on polygyny is also a annoyingly sexist. It arbitrarily decides that sharing a “high quality” man is better than being exclusive with a “low quality” man. First, different woman have different ideas about what a “high quality” man is. I don’t know if you noiced this, but women are less uniform than men about what constitutes attractiveness. We’re also less less likely than men to select a mate based on appearance (with all the studies you’ve clearly looked at, shouldn’t you have figured that out by now?). Wealth is also only one of many attributes to look for in mate selection. Like attractiveness, wealth is not going to make me tear my clothes off and disregard any negative traits he may have. So why would you assume there’s enough of a difference between “high quality” and “low quality” to justify having to share? Come to that, why is it mandatory to have a husband at all? I know that if I’m not ecstatic about a man, I wouldn’t marry him just because he’s the best I can find.

You seem like an intelligent, well-meaning person. Do a little reading about women and their place in this society, and I’m sure you’ll sort things out.